Excerpt from:  Value Networks Blog: Verna Allee
.
April 28, 2010

Is it System Dynamics or Value Network Analysis?

Both useful but very different

We recently posted a comparison chart of how process modeling, Social Network Analysis (SNA), and Value Network Analysis (VNA) are different. People sometimes also ask how is System Dynamics Modeling different from Value Network Analysis? 

The below example is not VNA. In fact, it is a particularly overwrought example of a system dynamics model has been floating around the Internet since it was first blogged by NBC's Richard Engel. More recently it was lampooned by the New York Times

Afghan Stability System Dynamic Model

Anything this complex might be useful for an analyst or a project team running scenarios - but should never be used as a general communication device. In value network modeling we encourage people to leave the complex visuals in the hands of the analysts. For general communication, simpler views with fewer nodes and links are better to make a point. At this level of visual complexity indicators and metrics are far more helpful to aid decisions.

While it is always fun to poke fun at bad examples, there is no question that System Dynamics is a powerful modeling tool that brings sharp insights into complex systems. It deals with internal feedback loops, stocks and flows, and time delays that affect the behavior of the system over time. Originally developed inthe 1950s to help corporate managers improve their understanding of industrial processes, system dynamics is currently being used throughout the public and private sector for industrial design as well as policy analysis and design. It is very useful for understanding how even seemingly simple systems display baffling nonlinearity and repetitive patterns.

Boeing Value Networks and System DynamicsSystem Dynamics modeling and value network analysis are complementary methods but very different. Boeing uses both approaches together as part of their Lean+ toolkit. They use system dynamics modeling to define the complex behaviors of the system and then engage managers in value network modeling to define the roles and interactions that are required for the system to function well. In this image Bob Wiebe, Dan Compton, and Les Music reference a system dynamic model that was used as a guide for the more detailed role-based value network map to the right. You can learn more in the Boeing Frontiers article, Testing the Limits. See the Wikipedia article on System Dynamics for some great animated examples.

So how is value network modeling different? Here is a simple comparison chart of the two methods. System Dynamics can be used to model work processes and human interactions but rarely shows them together. It is notablethat System Dynamics has a pretty steep learning curve, while the basics of value network modeling typically can be mastered in a shorter span of time. Thus System Dynamics is more of an "expert" tool while VNA is a tool for practitioners and managers.

Comparison System Dynamics and VNA

System Dynamics modeling applications are some of the many applications that are compatible with the Value Network Insights application. 

For more on Value Networks see:

Topic Tags:  Bob Wiebe, Boeing, comparison chart, Dan Compton, Les Music, system dynamics, value network analysis, VNA
Comments
.

Comment RE: Is it System Dynamics or Value Network Analysis?

Ex PA Consultant says he cannot fault value network analysis

May I add to this, noting that the systems dynamics (SD) map was prepared using PA Consulting Group. 

I have a great respect for PA, having been one of their management consultants in the  '70's and am aware that they now have a group which specialises in SD applications. 

Through networking with the UK based Association for Project Management (APM) and a Special Interest Group (SIG) chaired by an ex PA consultant, I met a current a Senior Consultant who was leading a team to solve a Home Office challenge at the time in the UK. 

I was informed by the former that the latter could not fault VNA after he had attended some of my sessions in London. We subsequently met up and talked generally about the nature of challenges he was addressing and how communication with the then Minister could be enhanced about the complexity of the situation.

The outcome was that insufficient time was available to incorporate VNA in reformulating the challenges. Shortly afterwards, he moved on to another consultancy.

Their is a paucity of knowledge about tools that simply address complex issues which is why SD is still widely used in Govt. circles. Also, being complicated, SD is useful to consultants as it requires considerable expertise to use them. So a win - win when budgets are not strained!

Now, with constrained budgets, it is particularly appropriate to tackle complex / complicated situations relatively simply for participants, using VNA, to buy in to the big picture before diving in to the systems dynamics, if needed -- a lesson Boeing learned a while ago, as you this blog points out. 

.
.

Comment RE: Is it System Dynamics or Value Network Analysis?

Very insightful article. Thank you.  I have always been interested in connections between 'things' and like to see the links between ideas, concepts, people, results.  The challenge is that all the connections can quickly become overwhelming.  I don't remember who said "pull on one thread and the universe is attached" but it illustrates the difficulties.  These articles help to clarify the different prisms that we can look through to reach insights and when to use each of them. 
.
.

Comment RE: Is it System Dynamics or Value Network Analysis?

I'm dubious to be honest.  VNA by its focus will produce less complicated models that the one illustrated.  However both ontological and epistemological assumptions are the same; causal links and qualitative assessment.  VNA is not based on complexity theory, its based on systems dynamics.  Nothing wrong in that (and I think the defense model is wrongly derided by theway), but its not complexity
.
.

Comment RE: Is it System Dynamics or Value Network Analysis?

Hi Dave, I always enjoy noodling distinctions with you. VNA has considerably evolved from early days when only qualitative assessment was possible due to technology limitations. Now VNA can be much more data driven and quantitative with our latest technology developments such as the predictive analytics made possible with our enterprise edition. Yes, there is an element of causal links in that the impact of inputs is assessed in terms of financial and non financial impact, but the inclusion of network analytics provides an enriched set of structural indicators that typically are not used in system dynamics.  Cheers, Verna
.
.

RE: Is it System Dynamics or Value Network Analysis?

I'm happy to agree that transaction data can help (although the better SD tools can also do that).  I'm also not challenging the value of VNA.  My point (and I do think its important) is that VNA is a systems dynamics tool in its basic assumptions not a complexity one.  Transaction data has its own limitations in terms of what can be implied from it as it lacks contextual metadata.  The phrase "predictive analytics" sort of makes my point for me (and well).  So I'm afraid I would still challenge your two bullet points on the differences between VNA and systems dynamics.  Your left hand labels are a bit unfair to the better class of SD tool; and VNA is one of those.  I think you can handle "complexity" in the sense of "complicated" but not in complex adaptive systems in respect of the "Whole system" (per your claim).
.
.

RE: Is it System Dynamics or Value Network Analysis?

Points well taken, Dave. Of course, all models and tools have limitations in the face of true complexity. However, the basic point I was making is that the theory base for VNA does draw heavily from exchange theory (from the field of social networks), and living systems theory. You yourself have often pointed out the usefulness of network analysis in complex environments. VNA actually sits closer to network analysis than it does SD, although I have no quarrel with your including it in the SD category.

For those who are following this and would like to learn more on the theory base of VNA these articles might be helpful. 

Value Network Analysis and the Conversion of Tangible and Intangible Assets

http://vernaallee.com/value_networks/Value_Conversion_JIC_online_version.pdf

A Value Network Approach for Modeling and Measuring Intangibles

http://vernaallee.com/value_networks/A_ValueNetwork_Approach.pdf

There is also my book The Future of Knowledge: Increasing Prosperity through Value Networks

Cheers,

Verna 

.